Nevada trooper sues Starbucks, claiming drink contained meth
FILE – This June 26, 2019 file photo shows a Starbucks sign outside a Starbucks coffee shop in downtown Pittsburgh. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar, File)
ovp test
Male shot by female at Shreveport apartment
Class to create biodiverse backyard
Rules for outbursts at Caddo School Board Meeting
Testing widget old system
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) – A Nevada Highway Patrol trooper has filed a lawsuit against Starbucks after he was served an iced coffee that contained methamphetamine, according to court documents.
Steven J. Darnell, 32, became sick after taking two to three drinks of an iced coffee he got at the Starbucks at 8975 S. Eastern Ave. on Sept. 11, 2020, according to a lawsuit filed Wednesday in Clark County District Court.
Starbucks did not respond to a request for comment on Friday. However, an email to the company generated an automatic reply.
Darnell is represented by Kevin Hanratty of the Las Vegas law firm Hanratty Law Group.
“Within a short period of time after ingesting the iced coffee, plaintiff became sick with ever worsening symptoms over the next couple of hours, including but not limited to burning sensations throughout the body, upset stomach, and shooting pain to his head. The burning sensations throughout his extremities lasted for approximately 2 weeks following the incident,” according to the lawsuit.
Allegations in the lawsuit indicate Darnell believes he was targeted because he is a member of the law enforcement community and Starbucks has “condoned and encouraged antipolice rhetoric” to defund police agencies. Darnell was in uniform when he bought the drink.
Darnell was “in full Nevada Highway Patrol uniform in a marked police vehicle with emergency light bar and went through the drive-thru,” the lawsuit states. He ordered an iced coffee “as was his custom to do so.”
Darnell is still a trooper with the Nevada State Police Highway Patrol division, according to Hanratty. Darnell lives in the Las Vegas valley.
Darnell suffered physical and emotional injuries, the lawsuit says.
The lawsuit outlines eight counts:
- Negligence
- Assault
- Vicarious Liability/Respondent Superior
- Negligent Hiring, Training, Supervision, Retention
- Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
- Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
- Breach of Warranty of Merchantability
- Breach of Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose
- Punitive Damages
The lawsuit seeks damages in excess of $15,000.
